Nate Honeycutt
  • About
  • Research
  • Data Viz
My research is rooted in the domain of political psychology, with a particular interest in topics related to higher education. This has included studies on minority influence, political bias, viewpoint/ideological diversity in higher education, scientific integrity, and political partisanship. Current/recent projects have explored manifestations of political bias in higher education, group dynamics involving numerical minorities, political diversity and the political climate among university faculty and students, national trends related to political polarization, speech and self-censorship dynamics among university faculty, and replication of other scientific work. 

Across my research and teaching I am data-driven and take an intellectually curious approach to understanding topics being investigated and taught. I've led and contributed to research projects at all stages, with close attention to detail. This has included brainstorming and design, survey creation, survey methodology, data collection, data analysis, data visualization, and writing up and presenting findings (for/to lay and academic audiences).


Google Scholar Profile—full listing of publications

Selected Publications

Honeycutt, N., Careem, A., Lewis, N. A., Jr., & Jussim, L. (in press). Are STEM Faculty Biased Against Female Applicants?  A Robust Replication and Extension of Moss-Racusin and Colleagues  (2012). Meta-Psychology. preprint pdf
Jussim, L., & Honeycutt, N. (2024). Bias in psychology: A critical, historical and empirical review. Swiss Psychology Open, 4(1). online version
Honeycutt, N. (2024). Silence in the classroom: The 2024 FIRE faculty survey report. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. pdf
Jussim, L., Honeycutt, N., Careem, A., Bork, N., Finkelstein, D., Yanovsky, S., & Finkelstein, J. (2024). The New Book Burners: Academic Tribalism. In The Tribal Mind and the Psychology of Collectivism​. Routledge.  preprint pdf
Clark, C. J., et al. (2023). Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(48), e2301642120. online version
Jussim, L., Honeycutt, N., Paresky, P., Careem, A., Finkelstein, D., Finkelstein, J. (2023). The Radicalization of the American Academy. In: Zúquete, J.P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Left-Wing Extremism, Volume 2. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. abstract / request pdf
Jussim, L., & Honeycutt, N. (2023). Psychology as Science and as Propaganda. Psychology Learning & Teaching. abstract / request pdf
Honeycutt, N., & Jussim, L. (2023). Political bias in the social sciences: A critical, theoretical, and empirical review. In Frisby, C.L., Redding, R.E., O'Donohue, W.T., & Lilienfeld, S.O. (Eds.), (2022). Ideological and political bias in psychology: Nature, scope and solutions. New York: Springer. preprint pdf
Honeycutt, N., Stevens, S., & Kaufmann, E. (2023). The academic mind in 2022: What faculty think about free expression and academic freedom on campus. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. pdf
Clark, C.J., Honeycutt, N., Jussim, L. (2022). Replicability and the Psychology of Science. In: O'Donohue, W., Masuda, A., Lilienfeld, S. (eds) Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology. Springer, Cham. preprint pdf
Honeycutt, N.*, & Jussim, L.* (2020). On the connection between bias and censorship in academia. preprint pdf
Stevens, S. T., Jussim, L., & Honeycutt, N. (2020). Scholarship suppression: Theoretical perspectives and emerging trends. Societies 10(4), 82. preprint pdf
Honeycutt, N., & Jussim, L. (2020). A model of political bias in social science research. Psychological Inquiry, 31(1), 73–85. pdf
Peters, U., Honeycutt, N., De Block, A., & Jussim, L. (2020). Ideological diversity, hostility, and discrimination in philosophy. Philosophical Psychology. pdf
Prislin, R., Davenport, C., Xu, Y., Moreno, R., & Honeycutt, N. (2018). From marginal to mainstream and vice versa: Leaders’ valuation of diversity while in the minority versus majority. Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 112–128. pdf
Honeycutt, N., & Freberg, L. (2017). The liberal and conservative experience across academic disciplines: An extension of Inbar and Lammers. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(2), 115-123. pdf
Twenge, J.M., Honeycutt, N., Prislin, R., Sherman, R. (2016). More polarized but more Independent: Political party identification and political views among U.S. adults and late adolescents, 1970-2014. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42​(10), 1364-1383. abstract / request pdf

Other Writing

Forbes: Political intolerance among university faculty highlights need for viewpoint diversity. November 21, 2016. Article.

* Order of authorship is alphabetical, both authors contributed equally.

Disclaimer: The articles provided on this website are subject to various copyrights. These pdf files are intended to facilitate the accepted practice that authors are allowed to distribute copies of their articles to interested parties for personal use. No commercial use may be made of the articles. Mass production of the articles is not permitted.
© 2011-2025 Nate Honeycutt. All Rights Reserved.